A new, more clever tagging system
We've talked a lot about making better use of our content classification and tagging system and now we've gone and done it.
The principle of a good classification system is all about telling items apart from one another as well as grouping items together that have some relationship or commonality. The best classification system we (read: human kind) has ever developed is the Scientific Classification of Organisms that helps us determine what family, genus, and species a living creature belongs in based on common and ancestral traits of the organism themselves. It get's really technical, like whether the hairs of the fur of a species are hollow or solid, but it's all there and does a fantastic job of helping us sort life out.
We've done the same thing with our website's blogs, videos, and everything else. All of our user generated content has been using a tagging system but we haven't been able to harness it well because users can tag things all willy nilly and in any order or sequence that they want - whether or not it makes sense. Instead, we're restricting the tagging decisions that our users can make, which sounds like a downside until you notice how it makes all of our sections more clear and meaningful. After some time working with this new system, we'll likely see interests grow around the subject-oriented areas of our site as people become attached to the environment section or the politics section of our site (to name a few).
For our users, they will notice that the way they have been tagging their articles has changed and they are now only allowed to choose only one parent section and one child section - much like choosing a genus and species - for their blogs and videos. They will also notice that when they edit older articles that they will be asked to re-tag their entries with the new system in order to complete the editing job.
This is just the start of a bunch of improvements to our site, we'll keep you tuned in as more work rolls out.
- Sean's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1276 reads


The tags on our site shouldn't be guidelines for what content you produce. The classification system here is only for helping you group your articles together with other common subjects. Your job with tagging is to choose the best parent and child category to file your work.
Your description of your article makes me think that you have a lot of choices. Your gardening choice is a toss up between Nature/Environment and Nature/Parks. Note that Crime is not a subcategory of Politics, which is also an interesting choice for you.
Sorry, didn't intend to be anonymous in that comment (see above); here's my name:
--Mary Holbrow
Thanks for the message, Sean. I can see that the single-tag system is good for specific topics like sporting events or city hall announcements. However, for broader topics it seems pretty limited.
For example, I recently included a "crime" tag (along with several others) on a gardening blog I wrote for NeighborMedia. A guy featured in the piece was a prisoner, and he was recruiting other prisoners for the garden project as part of a rehab program. How on earth do you tag that? Actually, I doubt that I'd write such a piece for the site if I knew it would have only a single tag.(And come to think of it, there isn't any "gardening" tag, either, although that's a popular topic and one I often write about.)
I agree that limiting tags makes sense for the huge amount of material you have to deal with, and obviously it may be the only way to go. However, it would be helpful to make the system somewhat flexible, and/or to create a more comprehensive list of tags.
--Mary