CNA Meeting: Magazine Beach
Photo: DCR Senior Planner Dan Driscoll discussed current and proposed improvements to Magazine Beach at the Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association Meeting April 13.
Magazine Beach was useful back at the beginning of the 19th century because of its isolation. It was part of a salt marsh along the Charles River at the southern tip of Cambridgeport. The slight elevation known as Captain’s Island offered a safe, remote spot for storing gunpowder and explosives.
The Commonwealth bought the property for that purpose in 1818. Now, almost two centuries later, Magazine Beach is anything but isolated. A city-owned recreation area serving an extended urban population, it’s also a place whose future requires long-range plans and cooperative efforts involving city and state agencies, philanthropic organizations and the public.
About 60 people attended a Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association (CNA) April 13 to hear plans for revitalization of the 15-acre park. The meeting was held in the cafeteria of the Morse School on Granite Street.
Photo: Before the meeting Charles Sullivan (center left, dark jacket), Executive Director of the Cambridge Historical Commission, led about 15 people on a history walk around the Powder House at Magazine Beach.
The meeting featured presentations by Dan Driscoll, Senior Planner for the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), and by Charles Sullivan, Executive Director of the Cambridge Historical Commission.
Among the attendees introduced by CNA President Bill August were State Representative Marty Walz (D-8th Suffolk District), State Senator Anthony Petruccelli (D-First Suffolk and Middlesex), and Cambridge Vice-Mayor Henrietta Davis.
Driscoll discussed plans for the future of the site as well as improvements that have already taken place or are currently under way. The CNA has received a $4,000 grant from the New England Grass Roots Environment Fund to foster community engagement in the planning process.
Wide-ranging improvements already in the works include shoreline restoration, stabilization of paths, and upgrading of recreational facilities. Vice-Mayor Davis noted that a $1.3 million project to improve the playing fields was funded by the city.
Among the possibilities Driscoll brought up were construction of a non-traditional playground, sidewalk improvements and limiting of the use of asphalt, improved seating, parking and traffic circulation, reconditioned fencing, and an entry plaza at the base of the footbridge. He estimated that some $2,150,000 would need to be raised.
During the question period some attendees criticized the choice of plant materials for the site; others brought up traffic and parking issues and the shortage of trash cans.
A Magazine Street resident said she and others were distressed by noise from the park, and she questioned the practice of allowing amplified music there. Driscoll said the plan is a partnership with the city, and that the issue of noise would be part of the discussion.
Suggestions have been made by the DCR and by local historians to place a historic marker in the park. Residents suggested incorporating a historical display into plans for the historic Powder House, which dates to 1818. They also proposed adapting the structure to a practical use such as boat rentals. Historian Sullivan endorsed this possibility.
“Using it is what will preserve it,” he said.
Some attendees had braved the rain earlier to go on a historical walk around the park with Sullivan. After Driscoll’s presentation Sullivan continued the story of the 15-acre property, which was bought by the city in 1863.
“They envisioned it as a park,” Sullivan said.
The river bank was reshaped and walled, the salt marsh was filled in, and Memorial Drive was laid out as a pleasure drive. The plan was developed by landscape architect Charles Eliot of Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot. With damming of the river in the 20th century the 9-foot tides were tamed, but the quiet water bred disease, and swimmers were exposed to waterborne infections.
“This was not a healthy place,” Sullivan said. Swimming in the river was banned, and in 1950 the swimming pool was opened.
One original landmark remains from the early days: the stone Powder House. By 1890 its roof had fallen in because the valuable copper nails, originally chosen for their non-sparking character, had been stripped out. The roof was replaced, but now there are gaping holes in the replacement.
Meeting organizer and CNA Board Member Cathie Zusy credited the organization’s President Bill August with getting the roof repair started. It was literally a grass-roots project.
“Bill is a runner, and one day as he went past the Powder House he was outraged to see plants and roots growing out of it. He pulled up some of them, and then we got a few local people together to clear away some more—that’s when we saw that the roof was open.” She said the group had raised nearly $1,900 for emergency roof repairs from local residents and from the Cambridge Heritage Foundation.
Conrad Crawford, Director of Partnerships at the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), said the roof repair will take place soon. He manages a matching funds program that helps to support DCR-managed parks, open spaces, and facilities.
- mholbrow's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 981 reads



The real problem on the Charles River and in Cambridge organizations like this one is exemplified by the censorship of negative comments by them.
They have the nerve to claim to be a "Neighborhood Association" and put in their rules censorship provisions allowing nobody to say anything to them and nothing to be said by them other than cheerleading for a very bad City Manager and a very bad City Council.
These fake groups keep the lie going that Cambridge has a responsible city government. These fake groups with their fake names have no real purpose except to fool people. It is just that this one is less dishonest than the others. AND VERY INDIGNANT ABOUT ITS SOLE PURPOSE TO BE A CHEERLEADER.
Oh, and the bizarre wall of introduced bushes is the only bordering vegetation on the Charles Basin not destroyed twice a year.
The state and city council accomplished this bizarre wall by promising swimming, now prohibitted, and by promising a lawn to the Charles, now prohibitted, and by promising no harm to the Charles River White Geese. They state now brags they are starving the Charles River White Geese. But that is negative talk and negative talk is prohibited by this city manager created organization.
A truly bizarre project with heartless animal abuse, the dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles, the walling off of Magazine Beach from the Charles River, reduction of playing field, and related massive destruction of trees, all exactly the opposite what was promised.
This fits in with the carefully hidden goal of killing off all animals living on the Charles River Basin.
Dumping of poisons on the banks of the Charles to keep alive sickly introduced grass after destruction of perfectly healthy grasses was prohibitted to be discussed.
Reduction of playing fields to drain off poisons which should not even be dumped on the banks of the Charles was prohibitted to be discussed.
The public meeting by a city manager created organization fit the pattern. ALL NEGATIVE COMMENT PROHIBITTED.
So how dare anybody object to massive waste of money and harm to city resources. That is negative comment.
How dare anybody object to the forthcoming destruction of the picnic area across from Magazine Street by destroying its parking. That is negative comment!! Negative comment is not allowed.
How dare anybody object to the destruction of zoning on the north side of Memorial Drive helped by this group's censoring of negative comment to reply to flat out lies there. And dare anybody object to the same group censoring objections to the accelleration of destruction on Magazine Beach. That is negative comment.
There is a benefit to all this. A bunch of city councillor who stay in office by lying that they are pro environment are helped to stay in office because negative comment is not allowed.
And we will not mention the hundreds of HEALTHY trees on Memorial Drive which are about to be destroyed. That might give an accurate assessment of very destructive city councilors.
Negative comments were prohibitted.
Need I say more?